[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[CVE-2012-4750] Ezhometech EzServer 7.0 Remote Heap Corruption Vulnerability
- To: bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [CVE-2012-4750] Ezhometech EzServer 7.0 Remote Heap Corruption Vulnerability
- From: lorenzo.cantoni86@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:04:07 GMT
[Title]:
Ezhometech EzServer 7.0 Remote Heap Corruption Vulnerability
[Description]:
EzServer is a software for audio and video streaming adopted by various
companies worldwide. Version 7.0 is affected by a remote heap corruption
vulnerability. Version 6.x is not affected by this issue, as does not implement
RTMP support.
[Affected Software]:
http://www.ezhometech.com/ezserver.htm
[Credits]:
Lorenzo Cantoni
[CVE]:
CVE-2012-4750
[CVSS]:
9.3 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C)
[Impact]:
A remote unauthenticated attacker can DoS the application. Remote Command
Execution could be possible, however an exploit has yet to be developed.
[Details]:
The vulnerability is caused by the following lines of code:
.text:00474533 cmp [ebp-33A0], 80h
.text:0047453D jle short loc_47458E
.text:0047453F mov eax, [ebp-33A0h]
.text:00474545 sub eax, 80h
.text:0047454A push eax ; Size
.text:0047454B mov ecx, [ebp-33CCh]
.text:00474551 add ecx, 81h
.text:00474557 push ecx ; Src
.text:00474558 mov edx, [ebp-33CCh]
.text:0047455E add edx, 80h
.text:00474564 push edx ; Dst
.text:00474565 call _memcpy_0
The application pass to memcpy() an uncontrolled size, which is directly taken
from the AMF request in the RTMP packet.After have successfully completed the
RTMP handshake, an attacker can send a malformed AMF request embedded in the
RTMP session, with an high value for the 'size' field (2 bytes, such as 0xFFFF)
and a lower-sized 'string' (such as 'connect'). This result in a heap
corruption and a crash for the application.
[Fix]:
Support for the RTMP protocol appears disabled (but not fully removed) in
version 7.1. However there is no official response from the vendor (see
disclosure).
[Proof of Concept code]:
http://pastebin.com/k05djr6C
[Disclosure]:
09/09/2012: Vendor contacted.
07/10/2012: No response. Sent another mail.
13/10/2012: Still no response. Disclosure.