[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning
- To: Tim <tim-security@sentinelchicken.org>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning
- From: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <jonathan@nuclearelephant.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:40:45 -0500
> The copanies aren't the thing. The people are the thing. This isn't
> corporate america, it is open source.
Exactly why I think the GPL needs to address issues like this. I've no
problem with a commercial entity using my code, or even incorporating it
into their own software...but if you're going to make a profit off of
merely redistributing someone else's work, or if your product is
basically someone else's work with a little wrapper around it, the
author should benefit. Bottom line, open source licensing is designed
to protect the author and benefit the community - and the GPL isn't
doing a very good job at that now that redistribution is commercialized.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html