On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 03:22, Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote: > Does Fedora even have a CD image or is it just another repository? Yes, there's ISO's for your convenient d/l and installation. > A CD > image is probably one of the easiest things they could put together, Easy maybe, but it still takes time and resources. Are you going to volunteer to build ISO's for Fedora? I thought not. But it's "the easiest thing they could put together"... > and > one of the most important things if they ever plan on being a viable > desktop solution for commercial enterprise. Well, did you even read what RedHat, the Fedora Project, and lots of people in this giant thread have been writing? Fedora is *not* meant to be a "viable desktop solution for commercial enterprise". RHEL 3 WS is. Apart from that, I feel it needs to be repeated that RHEL, apart from proprietary software RH might have thrown in, is still mostly GNU/Linux. As such they can't keep it from us, and they don't. If you want to build your own RHEL, go ahead, download the SRPMS, build them yourself, and even benefit from updated SRPMS whenever security issues need fixing. It's all there in the open. That way you also benefit from any other contributions RH has made to GPL'ed software, such as architecture specific ports/fixes/extensions, admin tools, RHDB, etc. The two things you don't get is support from RH, and the convenience of getting it all served on a silver platter. Although I have yet to build my first RHEL 3 box from SRPMS, I'm going to investigate this as a serious option for moving forward in the enterprise space. I wouldn't be surprised if small PC dealers and software distributors found selling Free-RHEL CD's at $50 a pop to be an additional business opportunity. For my own machines - give me Fedora any day. I've always found Red Hat Linux (as we know it) too conservative for home use. I like to live closer to the bleeding edge and ended up replacing lots of packages with self-compiles, causing all sorts of dependency problems... %-) (Jeez, I don't know why this topic is to hotly discussed on FD of all places. You don't see nearly as much about it in Linux newsgroups.) Cheers Steffen. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part