[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] why commcerical software *could* be better

Can you explain what responsibility does m$ take for its crap? Just read
the m$ EULA again before using the word "responsibility". (having the
right to say "fsck bill" does not qualify as responsibility).


This post was *not* about Microsoft.

There are enough bugs in windoze, but haven't you heard the rumours that
a lot of propriatary os code has leaked?

I heard *rumors*. Maybe they are true, maybe they aren't.
You can buy the source if you are a company/EDU that develops/researches on/for Windows.

China just got (paid for) an executable version too.

georgi 

--
      Gadi Evron (i.e. ge),
      ge@linuxbox.org.

The Trojan Horses Research mailing list - http://ecompute.org/th-list

My resume (Hebrew) - http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/resume.rtf

PGP key for ge@linuxbox.org -
http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron.asc
Note: this key is used mainly for files and attachments, I sign email messages using:
http://vapid.reprehensible.net/~ge/Gadi_Evron_sign.asc


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html