[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux
- To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft prepares security assault on Linux
- From: Luis Bruno <lbruno@republico.estv.ipv.pt>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:57:54 +0000
Gadi Evron wrote:
> there is a lot to be said for:
> 1. A serious (note serious) commercial company that has a crew working
> on addressing security concerns, and updating the product.
> 2. A commercial company providing with liability (and responsibility)
> for the software you use (in other words - someone to blame).
Your clients' safety is your own safety, and nobody was ever fired for
buying IBM either. But the accountability argument that goes with
$BIG_CORPORATION's name doesn't have any value. The EULA on your products
debunks the accountability myth.
--
Luis Bruno C8-H10-N4-O2-CH3-CH2-OH
UTM 29T 629481 E 4511776 N Alt: 576m
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html