Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: spoofing

["SPAM" <edwin@link.net.id>]

Same here ^__^

Thanks in advance.
Ed

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "bryce" <lord_ph@comcast.net>
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: spoofing


> Can you share your answer, some of us don't know it. ;)
>
> thanks,
> bryce
>
> sir kaber wrote:
>
> >Nevermind, found my answer.
> >
> >-kaber
> >;http://vertexabuse.cjb.net
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "sir kaber" <kaber@aliansystems.com>
> >To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
> >Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 11:24 PM
> >Subject: spoofing
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>Hi.
> >>I was just wondering, but what kind of measures have the big cable
> >>companies taken to prevent ip spoofing ? It seems like a simple
> >>problem to solve on the local router side, just make sure all ip
> >>packet source address originated from within the local network and
> >>most spoofing methods should be fixed ? Or are most big cable
> >>companies allowing you to generate ip packets with bogus info?
> >>
> >>
> >>- -kaber
> >>;http://vertexabuse.cjb.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
> >>
> >>iQA/AwUBP7h3qVIfUl3yRgwCEQJmJACeP+y3XzAxnJwKEMn3tGjal2+BS7IAoOGq
> >>8rNc4pThCOHxSoLatRbPaHYi
> >>=CkNT
> >>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html