[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sidewinder G2
- To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Sidewinder G2
- From: Michael Gale <michael@bluesuperman.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:44:01 -0700
Hello,
I agree, a Firewall should not be running any non-needed services, that
is why you have a DMZ or SSN. To place your mail, DNS and other servers
that require Internet access.
I believe two of the most secure firewalls are Cisco Pix and the
BorderWare Firewall. Cisco does not offer any services and Borderware
offers a few for small business and are very restrictive.
I suggest you get your money back -- I would rather take a linux box
with lids (Linux Intrusion Detection System [ www.lids.org ]) then the
Sidewinder.
Michael.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:40:01 -0500
Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com> wrote:
> Daniel Sichel wrote:
> > "Host the DNS and sendmail servers directly on your firewall. The
> > operating system should be better protected against a wide-range of
> > exploits."
>
>
> Implementing two of the most common targets of exploit sort of
> eliminates the usefulness of that "better" protection. Return their
> product and get your money back.
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html