also sprach Nick FitzGerald <nick@virus-l.demon.co.uk> [2004.02.08.2108 +0100]:
> Actually, it is _far_ from a _typical_ MS fix.
thanks for your reply, it made me check out rfc 1630 and, tataa,
user:pass@server/url is non-standard. thus, this is in fact the most
surprising fix from M$ in a long time.
> Second, it is very unlike MS to "fix" something when they know it will
> break some systems based on the "broken" behaviour.
unless of course it could harm competitors. then they will gladly do
so.
> > ... and absolutely ridiculous), ...
>
> Ahhhh -- so you're another genius who believes it is "ridiculous" to
> implement standards-conforming behavior? Or are you another genius who
> believes it is ridiculous for MS to implement improved security
> behaviour in its historically insecure web browser?
>
> Or perhaps you believe _both_ changes are ridiculous?
i retract my statement. i wrote that message on the train without
access to the RFC. i should have known better.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"marriage is the only adventure open to the cowardly."
-- voltaire
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature