and this has what to do with anything of importance or to the relevance of this mailing list? On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 09:56, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > some of the people told me that my signature isn't correct. > for some people here it looks like this or simelarly: > > Nico Golde | nico@xxxxxxxxx | 310777820@ICQ | nion@gmx.= > net > http://www.ngolde.de | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.= > gpg > Fingerprint | FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7= > CFF=20 > vim -c ":%s/^/WhfgTNabgureRIvzSUnpxreT-Tavba/|:%s/[R-T]/ /Ig|:normal > ggVG= > g?" > > i dont know why it is so, because for me and some others it looks like > this: > > Nico Golde | nico@xxxxxxxxx | 310777820@ICQ | nion@xxxxxxx > http://www.ngolde.de | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.gpg > Fingerprint | FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF > vim -c ":%s/^/WhfgTNabgureRIvzSUnpxreT-Tavba/|:%s/[R-T]/ /Ig|:normal ggVGg?" > > my mailer is mutt(linux) and i have really no idea why some people here say > it is so. > in the attachment is my signature file, if someone will take a look. > but i think it only depends on the mailer you use or the formation. > does someone have an idea? > regards nico -- |Keith A. Pachulski | PenTeleData LP1 Information Security and Privacy| |Phone: (800) 281.3564 x2454 | Pager: 6103497095@xxxxxxxxx| |PGP: 6B56 C8DC 6201 6D1A BFF5 5799 E193 ABAA 9549 74D0|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part