[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Phrack is dead, long live Phrack!
- To: starwars <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Phrack is dead, long live Phrack!
- From: xyberpix <xyberpix@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:34:01 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I really have to agree with starwars on this one, I have been reading
Phrack for years now, c'mon people even if a few groups are not willing
to try an publish Phrack for everyone to vote on, why don't a few of us
get together and keep Phrack going? Anyone who's interested in keeping
this part of all our lives in one way or another alive, mail me off the
list and lets make this happen.
xyberpix
On 23 Jan 2005, at 09:45, starwars wrote:
After several years of steady decline in the wrong hands, maybe it is
too late to save Phrack. But I think we owe something back to the zine
that gave us so much. Many us were drawn into computer security by
Phrack, grew up along with it, and were nourished by the high quality
papers of it's contributors.
The current editors of Phrack have decided to kill off Phrack for
good. This is an outrage. Phrack has always purported to be for the
community by the community. They have no right to kill off nearly
twenty years of tradition.
Despite it's poor performance of late, Phrack still has
an unparalleled and awesome record as a technical source you can really
bite your teeth into. It's also had a major cultural impact over the
years:
"You bet your ass we're all alike... we've been spoon-fed baby food at
school when we hungered for steak... the bits of meat that you did let
slip through were pre-chewed and tasteless. We've been dominated by
sadists, or ignored by the apathetic. The few that had something to
teach found us willing pupils, but those few are like drops of water
in the desert.
...
Yes, I am a criminal. My crime is that of curiosity. My crime is that
of judging people by what they say and think, not what they look like.
My crime is that of outsmarting you, something that you will never
forgive me for.
"
-- A hacker's manifesto, the Mentor, 1986
The current "anonymous" batch editors have outgrown the zine. They
were a bad choice to begin with, but regardless, that's happened to
phrack before. On a regular basis. Every generation or so passes on
phrack to the next. It's tradition.
What's different about the current batch of editors was their intense
arrogance and unusualy patronizing attitude towards the scene. Phrack
hasn't been about the computer underground for years. The last ten
years have turned Phrack into a prestigious journal for security
research.
The anarchistic underground roots of phrack have been whitewashed away
by the latest batch of editors. Go and read the issues from 1980s,
early 90s.
The reason this happened was that when the scene moved to the Internet
in the mid 90s the MIT hacker memes battled it out against "war games"
hacker meme of the 80s. Hacker still has an 80s meaning for the
general public, but the MIT hacker meme clearly won amongst the
technically savy. The "cracker" and "script kiddy" memes were part of
a process that turned Phrack's underground past into an embarrassment.
So Phrack gradually turned against it's own roots. It's not for the
hacker community by the hacker community anymore. Far from it. The
current incarnation of Phrack actually spreads hypocritical
anti-hacker memes between it's covers. It's BY
$150-an-hour-security-consultants FOR
our-reputation-in-the-security-industry.
Phrack has been hijacked by sellouts.
Aside from their snobbish elitist attitude, what have the recent
editors of Phrack contributed? The articles are written by others. Try
reading the "loopback" section written by the Phrack editors sometime.
Degrading newbies never gets old for these guys. Ha ha! you're all so
stupid! We're so uber elite!
So now what's happened is that these guys are so old school, so
been-there-done-that, patronizing assholes that they've decided it's
time for Phrack to die rather than evolve.
Here's an alternative to killing off a 20 year tradition: run a
competition amongst would-be editors who can publish the best next
issue of phrack. Then allow the PUBLIC to vote amongst alternatives as
to whom succeeds the current editors.
The team that manages to hack together the best edition of phrack 64
wins.
Phrack is dead. Long live phrack!
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
For Security And Open Source News And Info Visit:
http://www.xyberpix.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFB9q05cRMkOnlkwMERAoHmAJ9x62fwGEj7Q0ChRmegS1HwtdMPwQCePZkB
qAoFkYFA8iaoHpQJ1JjHdH4=
=adde
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html