[Full-Disclosure] Things that make you go "Hmmm"

["Burke N. Hare" <bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Somebody looking to bite the hand the fed them?


At 05:29 AM 3/1/2005 GMT, Jason Coombs wrote:
>Regarding PivX Solutions:
>
>I would like to make contact with anyone who has been harmed by PivX Solutions.
>
>If you have been harmed by PivX Solutions, please contact me as soon as 
>possible.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Jason Coombs
>jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>

but looking back a bit we see (check out the "from"):

> To: "Hugo van der Kooij" <hvdkooij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Advisory: Design flaw in human communication
> FROM: "Jason Coombs PivX Solutions" <jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: full-disclosure-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:10:20 +0000 GMT
>
> Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> >I would like to point out a design
> >flaw in human communication.
>
> What you describe is an implementation bug, not a design flaw.
>
> FD'ers in particular also appear to have a Reply To All defect whereby every 
> thought that enters one's head while reading FD is compulsively sent to the 
> entire list rather than to the individuals who may find the thoughts 
> interesting and relevant, despite those thoughts being off-topic.
>
> OT posts would be valuable to the tone and context of any list provided that 
> we could patch every mail client to remove the Reply To All feature.
>
> Shall we leave FD unmoderated with respect to any post that does not have 
> 'Re:' as the first three letters of its Subject line, but moderate all 
> replies?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html