Re: [Full-disclosure] Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France?

[Liu Die Yu <liudieyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

nothing would have happened to the hacker, if he had not published his 
eye-catching stuff.

the corporation wanted to punish this hacker because he somehow ruined 
their reputation ... and they did it successfully.

now french guys will think twice before publishing eye-catching 
stuff("i'm using illegal software?", "should i hide myself?", etc) ... 
such fear and sense of sin is what software vendors want.

jean-philippe Gaulier wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:40:46 +0100
> sec-list@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> > in France some strange things happen:
> > http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/0,2000061744,39183862,00.htm
> >    
>
> I disagree with this article. I'm french, I know Guillaume and don't like
> Viguard, so I think that I could chat about that a little more.
>
> Guillaume was convicted not for his publication, but because he used first
> a "pseudo" illegal copy of tegam viguard, and disassemble not for compatibility
>
> The decision of the court is defined as "really friendly" for the researcher
> community. 
>
> This point of view is explained by a french lawyer there :
> http://maitre.eolas.free.fr/journal/index.php?2005/03/08/87-guillermito-condamne-mais-tres-legerement
>
>
> See ya.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
>
> .
>
>  

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/