Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft GhostBuster Opinions

[J u a n <perfectirijillo@xxxxxxxxx>]

If you can't see that paper go to the wayback machine (tm):
http://web.archive.org/web/20031006165433/http://vx.netlux.org/lib/vsc07.html


On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:38:49 -0800, Jeremy Bishop <requiem@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 March 2005 17:58, Ron DuFresne wrote:
> > If the kernel is modified, on a windows or *nix system, you are going
> > to have a clear clue upfront;  the system will have rebooted.
> 
> From way back in '98, a paper on patching a (running) kernel on a linux
> system.
> http://vx.netlux.org/lib/vsc07.html
> 
> --
> "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes.  Just then, he vanished.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/