[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: ZH2005-03SA -- multiple vulnerabilities in NukeBookmarks .6

Paul Laudanski wrote...
> I can understand how full path disclosure can be an issue, however, in
> a production environment the PHP settings to display errors ought to
> be disabled. As such, full path disclosure goes away.

> That is true if the default table names are used. However it would be
> worth noting that with any web presence that uses a backend database,
> the
> prefix ought to be changed to something random and non-default.
>
> Does this completely solve the issue, of course not, but it can stop
> the script kiddy attacks. For more on this:
>
> http://unixwiz.net/techtips/sql-injection.html
>
> Thanks for the disclosure.

So, noone should publish any buffer overflow vulnerability... the stack
protection in Windows SP2 and grsecurity can solve every problem...
right? :)

Buh!

Greetings

        Gerardo Di Giacomo
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/