[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Case ID 51560370 - Notice of Claimed Infringement
- To: Full-Disclosure <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Case ID 51560370 - Notice of Claimed Infringement
- From: Thomas Sutpen <sutpen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:48:19 -0700
On Apr 5, 2005 5:01 AM, Ag. System Administrator <sysadmin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> More nice will be if this .iso file is just 451,486k of /dev/random junk.
> Any proves that this file __IS__ Sybase Powerbuilder 9 Enterprise.iso?
> MD5? Something?
The question that would begged to be asked is how they verified it.
If they were to download copyrighted software from somebody sharing
copyrighted software, does this not also constitute a crime? Is it
not true that downloading illegally shared software is itself illegal?
I'm not a lawyer, of course, but it's been my observation that the
legal system doesn't often smile on those breaking the law to prove
that others are breaking the law, unless it's in a Hollywood movie, no
pun intended.
Perhaps copyright makes some sort of concession for this. But it
makes one wonder...
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/