[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Case ID 51560370 - Notice ofClaimedInfringement
- To: "Jason" <security@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Case ID 51560370 - Notice ofClaimedInfringement
- From: "Jason Coombs" <jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:12:29 +0000 GMT
> The content inside is still fully usable
> and valid but a violation cannot be
> confirmed without yourself violating
> the law.
First of all, what law do you believe is violated by 'downloading' an
unauthorized MP3 duplication of a recording?
Fair use doctrine covers this situation in a number of ways. For example, you
do not violate copyright by downloading a file in order to find out what it is
and where it came from, any more than you violate copyright by tuning into a
radio broadcast. Somebody ELSE violates copyright if they broadcast a
copyright-protected work, or distribute copies for download. You, as
downloader, are fully within the fair use doctrine if you just receive,
contemplate, and destroy upon recognizing that the work was not distributed by
an authorized distributor/broadcaster.
How do you know what is and isn't authorized? Are you required to judge a book
by its cover, even though the cover is nothing more than a filename in these
cases? You are fully within the fair use doctrine if you download for the sole
purpose of causing your computer to examine metadata that may allow you to
determine the content, or if you contemplate the content with your senses by
playback or access -- when and if you are satisfied that you have received a
work that perhaps has not been duly licensed, you are in fact free to locate
the copyright holder and negotiate a license.
Furthermore, in the get-a-clue department once again, the people who are doing
the downloading to assist copyright holders with enforcement actions or
investigations HAVE WRITTEN PERMISSION and therefore cannot be accused of
violating the law by doing the download.
Why do people insist on spreading FUD when these are simple matters of
intellectual property law and contract law that any person above the mental age
of 14 has no trouble understanding when the facts are presented clearly?
Cheers,
Jason Coombs
jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/