[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft April Security Bulletin Webcast BS
- To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft April Security Bulletin Webcast BS
- From: dk <dk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:05:33 -0500
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Wow... so, I'm listening to the webcast while doing my work today. I just
heard him (the male presenter) say (three times now) that because some of
the vulnerabilities have *not been publicly disclosed* that they are *not
publicly exploitable*.
*OMFG*.
MS exploit motto?
<teasing_baby_voice>
Peek-a-booo!
If you can't see me,
I can't see you!
</teasing_baby_voice>
I guess they are just trying to reinforce their recent idea that 0dayz
== NULL and only patches beget exploits. While obviously wrong, this
/is/ a handy PR stance I guess. If they say it enough times, it might
just become true too, right? (Developers, Developers, Developers....)
Heheheh -- Sorry, too much sugar this afternoon.
--
dk
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/