[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-disclosure] Re: Publishing exploit code - what is it good for
- To: Aviram Jenik <aviram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: Publishing exploit code - what is it good for
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:07:47 +0900 (JST)
Interesting, becuase this just hit me the other day.
Wearing my sysadmin hat, I woke up one morning to find that the NetBSD
package converters/xlreader had a vulnerability. Nobody seemed to have
a patch for it, but looking at it, even with my rather limited level of
C coding skill, I reckoned I could fix it. (Standard buffer overflow:
replace sprintf with snprintf kinda thing.) So I did.
Or at least, I think I did. I can't get my hands on a working exploit,
so I don't feel truly comfortable that I did indeed fix the problem. Maybe
to someone more familiar with C it would be proved fixed by inspection,
but I don't feel that comfortable with it myself.
I didn't really used to think that exploits were so useful until this.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs@xxxxxxxxx> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.NetBSD.org
Make up enjoying your city life...produced by BIC CAMERA
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/