Re: [Full-disclosure] "responsible disclosure" explanation (an

[bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

> iss forgot it's handling of the apache chunk bug:
> http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/ISS/2002-06/0009.html
> quote:
> ------
> ISS X-Force deals with all vendors on a case-by-case basis
> to provide maximum protection for **our customers** and the community. 
> ------


Last I checked Gobbles found this exploit and ISS simply reported it being 
exploited in the wild. 
Of course they are going to alert their *paying customers* before alerting the 
public mailing lists. 

- zeno
http://www.cgisecurity.com

> 
> -- 
> where do you want bill gates to go today?
> 
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:04:23PM -0400, Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta) 
> wrote:
> > Just in case anyone is interested, the ISS Vulnerability Disclosure
> > Guidelines were made public a couple years ago, and last revised on July
> > 15, 2004.  The document is available here:
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/