[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computer forensics
- To: "Donald J. Ankney" <dankney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computer forensics
- From: Jason Coombs <jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:58:32 -1000
Donald J. Ankney wrote:
Your definition is just a subset of the standard, broader one.
When a word causes widespread misunderstanding such that you simply
can't use it to communicate ideas clearly, the old meaning becomes
archaic. I think that's what has happened with Trojan. Proof of this can
be found in the list of malware that anti-Trojan software is designed to
detect -- without double-checking this, just from memory, I'm going to
say that the list of malware detected by the typical anti-Trojan
software product is limited to malware that meets my definition and does
not include the broader definition. That causes a real problem, in
practice, since if the anti-Trojan doesn't stop spyware then how can
spyware be a Trojan?
Regards,
Jason Coombs
jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/