[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computer forensics
- To: Erik Kamerling <ekamerling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computer forensics
- From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:34:29 -0500 (CDT)
Yeah, this is a late, late, *late* posting - I opened it last for some
reason. Shoot me.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Erik Kamerling wrote:
> Copied from the SANS Glossary of Terms Used in Security and Intrusion
> Detection.
>
> http://www.sans.org/resources/glossary.php
While I realize that this is not going to be a wildly popular point, let
me remind you that SANS is not the kind of place I would use as an
authoritative reference in terms of debate. SANS is a for profit corp.,
and was run as such even when they were playing possum as a non-profit.
They are *not* a "disinterested third party" any more than the anti-virus
firms are - and not many people would use *them* as an authoritative
reference (assuming of course that there are other sources).
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@xxxxxxx
0xBD4A95BF
I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is
a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and
bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they
are intended to support.
don zweig, M.D.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/