Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computerforensics

["Jason Coombs" <jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

J.A. Terranson wrote:
> SANS is a for profit corp.,
> and was run as such even when
> they were playing possum as a
> non-profit.
> They are *not* a "disinterested
> third party" any more than the
> anti-virus firms are - and not
> many people would use *them*
> as an authoritative reference

To drive this point home, Newton's Telecom 'Dictionary' has some amazingly bad 
'definitions' -- for example, the definition of 'multimedia' includes data that 
is transmitted or viewed by way of a fax machine.

http://www.harrynewton.com/

Newton's 'definition' of 'Internet' starts out with a first-person narrative on 
how difficult it is to define the Internet. Pure crap.

Anyone who puts effort into writing a book should be encouraged to publish it, 
but publishers (and readers) should care a little about commercial misuse of 
labels like 'dictionary' when the definitions have only a single biased author.

There are some very impressive collaborative, community-developed computer 
dictionaries and encyclopedias. They do a nice job most of the time, because 
they are constantly peer-reviewed and corrected.

Anyone presumptuous enough to arbitrarily define technical terms without 
considerable careful thought and then publish the arbitrary text and call it a 
'dictionary' should be shot.

Regards,

Jason Coombs
jasonc@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/