[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Request to publish your Proof of Concept (esc1.html)



On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:02:28 +0545, Bipin Gautam said:

> WHAT/who is stoping you from rewriting the POC making slight changes
> in program flow? No that ain't against the law... or is it?

At least under US law, "slight changes" would make the POC a "derivative work",
which would be against the law without a suitable license from the original
copyright holder - and you can't even use "fair use" to wiggle around this one,
as the POC would almost certainly require much more code copying than what "fair
use" would cover.

What *would* be legal is looking at the original, figuring out how it worked,
and then writing a totally new and original POC that utilized the same principle
(as only the expression is copyrightable, not the idea expressed).

Of course, IANAL, and you'd probably want to ask a competent lawyer specializing
in intellectual property if you think the lawyer's answer might matter....

Attachment: pgpJU3jkQfl5z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/