[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall.
- To: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] HTTP AUTH BASIC monowall.
- From: Tim <tim-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:58:58 -0500
> Actually, encryption can do some good, even in the absence of authentication.
>
> Even if the remote end is totally unauthenticated, you have at least
> guaranteed
> that nobody is doing any passive sniffing of the content in transit. You've
> at least forced an attacker to mount an active MitM attack, which is both more
> challenging and has a higher risk of detection....
I concede. In the vast majority of communications situations, MitM is
only a little more difficult than passive sniffing, but in some it does
make a difference. In particular, some broadcast mediums make MitM very
difficult without detection (radio broadcast, for instance).
In addition, if you can guarantee perfect forward secrecy without
authentication, at least the attacker must use a MitM attack right then.
Offline analysis won't reveal the encrypted content.
thanks,
tim.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/