[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christian Khark Lauf <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] -ADVISORY- % =Thu Mar 16 13:23:37 EST 2006= % Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Access
- From: David Thiel <lx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:10:57 -0800
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:49:59PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> > If you have read http://unixgu.ru/?go=tor you would have known, that
> > he's running a Tor Node on this machine.
>
> And the *visible difference* between a Tor node and an open proxy, is what,
> exactly? Other than it's harder to put a sniffer on the other side and see
> where the traffic inbound to the proxy is coming from?
Well, by default, Tor doesn't allow port 25 out of exit nodes. In
this case however, not only has the operator opened up port 25 out,
effectively making it an open relay, but he's actively sniffing and
publishing exit node traffic - apparently under the misguided belief
that it makes him appear terribly clever.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/