Re: [Full-disclosure] FrSIRT Puts Exploits up for Sale

[Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:44:10AM +0100, Michal Zalewski wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 rembrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > If you puplish something without a license it is OPEN DOMAIN
> > That means people can use it, modify it, sell it...
> 
> That's nonsense. If I publish a book or a photo or a newspaper article
> without a lengthy license attached, you can copy it at will, too? The
> requirement of a license or a copyright notice is a long-running myth - it
> is good to have these, but they are not a legal requirement.
>

IANAL but believe that putting copyright sh*t in exploits/advisories
wouldn't hurt exploit writers (even if anonymous).

[1]
http://cve.mitre.org/compatible/product_type.html

just look how many lamers profit from copy/paste with the mouse
(hint - search for vulnerability database)

AFAIK hamericans are suing for getting fat because they eat too much, so
clear violations of international copyright law like this:

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:r4EuqF0hL9YJ:www.frsirt.com/exploits/20041216.Guninski.php+copyright+guninski+site:www.frsirt.com&hl=bg&gl=bg&ct=clnk&cd=1

may raise some money with little to no investment in hungry lawyers.

another irony is the fact that v3nd0rs try to convince people that exploits
are illegal, but legitimate businesses *sell* exploits - [1].


-- 
ж

EOM




































































junk
vvvv
 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/