Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Noise on the list

["Micheal Espinola Jr" <michealespinola@xxxxxxxxx>]

No he shouldn't.  Because if people cannot moderate themselves from
childish behavior, and if this list is the target of repeated abuse,
it needs some sort of check.

I don't think anyone here wants to see actual content moderation - and
I don't think that's the answer to the problem anyways. And certainly
no one wants the possibility of information not freely flowing.  But
this list NEEDS a filter of some sort.  A content/SPF filter of some
perhaps?

On content:  Perhaps the list can go un-moderated without allowing
profanity - thus filtering out a lot of needless bitch sessions [and
continued retribution] ?  Certainly there are words that have no place
in Full-Disclosure.

On SPF:  Perhaps some of the bogus impersonation posts would get
caught/blocked by a simple SPF check?

I don't need a public spanking for posting this. I'm only trying to
think of a way that we can do something about what is becoming the
serious decline of the list. I can ignore and filter my email just
fine - but I know what's going on and I just want to see things get
better.  They seem to continuously get worse.

On 3/21/06, Dave Korn <davek_throwaway@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Edward Pearson wrote:
> > I shouldn't have to get the fucking spamfilter involved when we're
> > talking about a mailing list.
>
>   Yes, you fucking should.  This is a NON-moderated list.  There are plenty
> of perfectly good moderated lists out there which you won't have to filter.
> But /this/ list is a non-moderated list, on which every individual
> subscriber is handed the full responsibility for and control over what they
> do or do not see.  That's the whole point.
>
>   In short, exactly what you want is perfectly easily available, but you'd
> rather complain about something else not being it.  That's like filling your
> car with diesel when it takes unleaded, complaining that your tank is now
> full of crap that you didn't want in it, and when someone points out that
> the other pipe on the same pump gives you unleaded you just stand there,
> waving the diesel hose and complaining about how *this* one ought to give
> unleaded as well because that's the one you want it to come out of.
>
>   Go elsewhere and you will be happy.  Go to bugtraq, where you *will* be
> spoonfed the prefiltered predigested pap that appears to be what you want.
>
>     cheers,
>       DaveK
> --
> Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>


--
ME2

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/