Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws

["GroundZero Security" <fd@xxxxxxx>]

first you say:
"One reason being the folks within the n3td3v group are actually people from 
MS, YAHOO, AOL, etc already"
or:
"the n3td3v group is the biggest thing you'll ever meet in your life time"
then later:
"..as the big players get it so badly wrong infront of the international stage"

isnt that conflicting ? first you pretend that you (and your imaginary group) 
would be the biggest shit out there,
but then you refer to SANS as the big players while you first braged that your 
imaginary people work for MS etc.
try to keep your story straight....
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: n3td3v 
  To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 5:46 AM
  Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to 
scrapPatchTuesday for Critical flaws


  Wow, hence the ideals of being an anonymous group. Like if names were put to 
list, they wouldn't be sacked straight away... Wake up, smell the postitives of 
being anonymous for five minutes, or maybe that leaves you, CERT, SANS a bit 
head rubbed, just like SANS once said FIREFOX posed a lesser threat that IE. 
OH, the guys I speak to at MS were chuckling about that one. Of course SANS 
reversed their claim that FIREFOX was less vulnerable than IE later, much 
later. The credibility of SANS, of course comes into questions, while folks at 
n3td3v c onsortium laugh with glee, as the big players get it so badly wrong 
infront of the international stage.


  On 3/26/06, William Lefkovics <william@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
    Not to mention the absence of legitimate names of the folks.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Hoye
    Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:08 PM 
    To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Industry calls on Microsoft to scrap
    PatchTuesday for Critical flaws

    On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:39:32AM +0100, n3td3v wrote: 
    > One reason being the folks within the n3td3v group are actually people
    > from MS, YAHOO, AOL, etc already.

    You know, legitimate groups don't have to keep claiming, over and over, that
    they're legit. 

    It's remarkable how that works.

    --
    "Totally mad. Utter nonsense. But we'll do it because it's brilliant
    nonsense." - Douglas Adams

    _______________

    _______________________________________________ 
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
    Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
  Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
  Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/