Re: [Full-disclosure] Strange interactions between tunnelling and SMB under the proprietary Microsoft Windows environment

[3APA3A <3APA3A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Marc SCHAEFER,


--Thursday, March 30, 2006, 9:52:10 AM, you wrote to 
full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

MS>    Testing pings and telnet on the remote tunnel address (e.g.
MS>    192.168.1.2) and capturing data with the libre software Ethereal on the
MS>    real Ethernet interface did show me that the flow of data was
MS>    correctly routed through the tunnel.

MS>    However, accessing \\192.168.1.2\c$ did go through the Ethernet
MS>    interface, and *not the tunnel*, and strangely half-using the private
MS>    addresses!

Make sure "Client for Microsoft Network" is bound to tunnel adapter.

Microsoft's  network filesystem works with NIC in "shorten" way: data is
copied  from  the disk to the file cache (physical memory), and the same
physical memory address is given to NIC to transfer data. And vice versa
for  network  client.  It  eliminates  copying  file data from memory to
memory  using  CPU.  That's why there can be differences in the CIFS/SMB
behavior comparing with the rest of TCP/IP stack. Also, this can lead to
incompatibilities with "emulated" NICs.

-- 
~/ZARAZA
http://www.security.nnov.ru/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/