[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Sony: No firewall and no patches
- To: Tracy Reed <treed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ivan ." <ivanhec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Sony: No firewall and no patches
- From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 02:49:05 +0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tracy Reed [mailto:treed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 7:17 PM
> To: Ivan .
> Cc: Thor (Hammer of God); full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Sony: No firewall and no patches
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:33:23AM +1000, Ivan . spake thusly:
> > I guess that makes a mockery of the PCI DSS framework!
>
> Not at all. PCI DSS does not guarantee security. And if they didn't have a
> firewall and were running outdated software they weren't compliant
> anyway.
I agree - You can chalk that one up to the auditors. There was mention of that
in the article, and I too would be interested in what auditing firm signed off
on that one. I too am in the list of people hosed, and it is this type of
thing that makes me happy that I practice what I preach when it comes to using
a separate card (and account) for internet purchases as well as an assigned PO
box. I'm *really* glad I used a fake birthday, but I do that all the time.
SONY ORD stock has also dropped 10% since the 26th of April. Pretty harsh.
This will end up costing everyone quite a bit.
t
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/