[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Sony: No firewall and no patches
- To: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Sony: No firewall and no patches
- From: "Ivan ." <ivanhec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:24:16 +1000
Ill throw this into the mixer while on topic of FWs
The TCP Split Handshake: Practical Effects on Modern Network Equipment
http://nmap.org/misc/split-handshake.pdf
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Thor (Hammer of God)
<thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I would be extremely interested to learn details of how a stateful firewall
> > in
> > front of a server saved a company, when stateless ACLs in hardware-based
> > network infrastructure devices would've led to failure. Seriously, if you
> > don't
> > mind outlining the scenario, I think it would be very instructive.
>
> I'd be happy to - I too would like to dive a bit deeper into what your points
> are as I find them interesting as well. Let's take it offline - you can
> share back with the group if you feel it valuable.
>
> t
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/