[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Sony: No firewall and no patches
- To: "full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Sony: No firewall and no patches
- From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:15:09 +0000
On May 12, 2011, at 12:09 AM, phocean wrote:
> I still don't see how the hell the typical web server will handle as much
> traffic as one of these Checkpoint, Cisco or whatever monsters.
That's the dread secret - they aren't really 'monsters'.
> But on a large network with inter-vlan filtering, it matters a lot. Believe
> me, this one is based on my operational experience.
Size <> complexity, complexity <> size. They are orthogonal concepts. Small
networks can be complex, large networks can be simple.
> I still trust more the network stack of a Linux/BSD/IOS dedicated box than
> the one of a Windows Server.
Sure - but that has nothing to do with the 'sanity checks' and 'inspectors',
which are custom-coded.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@xxxxxxxxx> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/