Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 89, Issue 11: ] How much time is appropriate for fixing

["Mikhail A. Utin" <mutin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Paul,
You completely missed my point. I was talking about the foundation of this 
list, which is free service, and the foundation of a lot of current IT 
technologies, which is freeware. Giving knowledge for free (including software 
bugs) is the foundation of this civilization. Having profit is a necessity but 
not all what drives us. Could you personally show any your contribution to the 
society? Which was not paid for?
My contribution you can find searching/google for my name and "article", and 
DeepSec 2011 and OWASP AppSec DC 2012 presentations as well. Nobody paid me 
for. Plus, you can check our portal www.201cmr1700ma.com, which provides 
knowledge and security documents for free. Then, considering you association 
with math science, you can possibly estimate the time I've spent for free.
So, my voice pro free knowledge distribution is completely legitimate.

Sincerely

Mikhail utin, CISSP, PhD

-----Original Message-----
From: paul.szabo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:paul.szabo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 6:41 PM
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mikhail A. Utin
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 89, Issue 11: ] How 
much time is appropriate for fixing

Dear Mikhail,

>> From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Kanthak
>>      <stefan.kanthak@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>>      <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> I'm not contradicting myself at all - in fact, *you* are the exact 
>> type of person I'm talking about.  You couldn't give a rat's ass 
>> about the industry or anyone but yourself.  Nothing you have ever 
>> done has been "valuable" to anyone other than you; it has been 
>> completely self-serving egotistical bullshit.
>
> I completely agree with Thor. ...

You cannot possibly agree with someone who addresses two people in the 
singular. You should not agree with someone who ascribes behaviourial patterns 
to others, based on his own character traits.

Are you familiar with Georgi's work? Please look at his website before 
proffering opinions.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo   psz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of Sydney    Australia
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any attachments may 
contain confidential 
and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named 
above. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
communication 
in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of it or its 
contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please reply to the 
sender immediately or by telephone at (617) 426-0600 and destroy all copies of 
this communication 
and any attachments. For further information regarding Commonwealth Care 
Alliance's privacy policy, 
please visit our Internet web site at http://www.commonwealthcare.org.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/