Re: [Full-disclosure] Linux - Indicators of compromise

[Benji <me@xxxxxxxxx>]

SO you're talking about making a baseline?

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Ali Varshovi <ali.varshovi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello everybody and thank you for your useful comments.
>
> Now I'm thinking that we need a comparison base or normal behavior profile to 
> be able to detect any deviations or abnormal/suspicious activity. While some 
> known patterns of behaviors are useful to detect malware or backdoors we 
> still need that normal profile to detect 0-day or APT style intrusions. Isn't 
> that the same idea from early days of intrusion detection research (anomaly 
> detection approach)? Or maybe I'm off track.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ------Original Message------
> To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Linux - Indicators of compromise
> Sent: Jul 14, 2012 8:46 AM
>
> Greetings FD,
>
> Does anyone have any guidelines/useful material on analysis logs of a Linux 
> machine to detect signs of compromise? The data collection piece is not a 
> challenge as a lot of useful information can be captured using commands and 
> some scripts. I'm wondering if there is any systematic approach to analyze 
> the collected logs? Most of the materials I've seen are more aligned to 
> malware and rootkit detection which is not the only concern apparently.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ali
> .
> ---------------------------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry device
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/