offtopic: text/plain vs multipart/alternative (Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Exploiter meets FireFox)

[3APA3A <3APA3A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Berend-Jan Wever,

It's  very common practice to send messages to public lists in plaintext
format. It reduces traffic significantly because in your case message is
3  times  larger  than  it  should  and  also  simplifies automated mail
processing.

Bugtraq denies messages in HTML format and I feel it's correct.

Please  correct  settings  of your gmail account (if possible) to do not
use HTML.

P.S. I'm not sure David is bugtraq moderator now.

-- 
~/ZARAZA
http://www.security.nnov.ru/


--Thursday, September 22, 2005, 7:25:17 AM, you wrote to 
full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

BJW>   PS. Does anybody ever talk to Dave Ahmad? All my posts from gmail
BJW> seem    to   bounce   of   securityfocus   for   this   reason:    
BJW> <bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:   ezmlm-reject: fatal: Sorry, I
BJW> don't  accept messages of MIME Content-Type 'multipart/alternative'
BJW> (#5.2.3)  I'm  wondering  if  it's  just  me or everybody that uses
BJW> gmail?





_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/